Rural human capital in the conceptual optics: Continuum and/or post-ism?

In explanatory dictionaries, “post” is interpreted either as a prefix that has the same meaning word “after” (the most obvious and well-known examples from social sphere are post-imperialist or post-colonial (world), post-Soviet (period), post-socialist (countries), etc.), first part of compound words, denoting what exists/happens based on second (post-impressionism, postmodernism, post-industrial, etc.) [see, e.g.: 4]. On aggregator websites definitions different dictionaries 13], mainly something occurs after something, but in relation to philosophical trends end 20th century (postmodernism, postpositivism, poststructuralism, it not only about “after”, also kind (not dialectical negative) denial immediate predecessors - changing (or destroying) accepted ideas hierarchy attitudes methods, which can be applied human activities beyond philosophy (post-capitalism, postcommunism, post-Fordism, 15]. The lexical research legitimacy been questioned for long time, taken granted scientific official discourses; however, question whether this “tool” analytical conceptualization universal distorting effect “optics” “rhetoric” and, accordingly, discriminatory corresponding objective realities, given heterogeneity contemporary social-economic other processes. particular, we use concepts with assess state prospects so-called “human capital”, considering its variability conditional already traditional “rural-urban continuum”. article presents an attempt provide preliminary assessment universality limitations) study rural “cluster” capital.